| If you are a
botanist or ecologist, or indeed any sort
of biologist, and work in the area where Agathis
grows (see map
below, shaded areas represent the range
of Agathis),
then you might find the following
suggestions about identifying the genus
in the field, and about how to make good
herbarium collections of Agathis,
useful or
interesting. 
Obviously,
never collect anywhere without (a) a
permit from the appropriate authorities
in the country in question, AND (b)
permission from the person or people who
own or control the land.
(1)
Identifying Agathis
Agathis
is an extraordinarily distinct genus. Two
easy vegetative field characters alone
suffice to differentiate members of the
genus from all other living organisms.
These are
(i) the
completely flat leaves with parallel
resin canals and (obviously) no venation.
(ii) the rounded, ball-like appearance of
the growing tips.
Character
(i) separates the genera Nageia
(Podocarpaceae) and Agathis from all
others. Character (ii) separates Agathis
from Nageia (which like all
other Podocarpaceae has pointy growing
tips). If the plant has recently flushed
with new growth, it may be difficult to
tell the genera apart at first, so a
further useful tip is to take a mature
leaf and attenpt to fold it so that apex
and base meet, and then smooth it with
your fingers from the apex/base end to
the fold. Coriaceous Agathis
leaves will almost always snap. Nageia
leaves, which tend to be a bit thinner
and more supple, will only seldom snap.
The bark
is also extraordinarily distinctive (see
picture in Flora Malesiana I:
10 (3): 432), and with
experience can usually be spotted from
tens of metres away even in dense forest.
From above, the trees are often
emergent/predominant above the canopy and
have a distinctive architecture and
appearance. The pollen cones are also
completely unmistakeable, but perhaps
only to the trained eye, and they are
quite difficult to describe.
(2)
Collecting Agathis
From a
taxonomic point of view, however, it is
not the leaves which are important
(although if they can be collected they
should be) but the male cones. In the
Araucariaceae, mature female cones
shatter in the canopy, so the taxonomy of
the genus is based almost entirely on
characters of the pollen cone and the
constituent microsporophylls. Shortly
after anthesis, these are abscised and
fall to the floor, where they often
persist for many months in the thick and
slow-rotting carpet of Agathis
leaves. They are very much worth
collecting. Have a look at the photos on
the 'Images' page for an
idea of what they look like. Spotting
them in the leaflitter may be quite
difficult at first, but a quick rummage
at the very base of the tree usually
recovers at least a few. They may well be
partially rotted or disintegrated -
obviously, if you can collect whole
pollen cones they are much preferable,
but if you can't see any that aren't
damaged don't worry - partially damaged
collections are still useful for
microsporophyll characters.
I've
tried spirit collection, and I've tried
drying, and contrary to my fears dries
pollen cones, although they do
disintegrate, do not do so rapidly. I
therefore think drying is preferable, and
much more convenient as well. I recommend
collection into thick paper bags (I use
manila-paper brown envelopes from
stationers for this purpose), folding the
top over and sealing with a paperclip,
and leaving them somewhere warm to dry
the moisture from them before sending
them home.
|